论文标题
轻松计算贝叶斯因子以完全量化Occam的剃须刀
Easy computation of the Bayes Factor to fully quantify Occam's razor
论文作者
论文摘要
贝叶斯因子是用于将模型与数据的拟合进行比较,用于假设选择和参数估计的金色标准。但是,它很少使用,因为它在计算上非常密集。在这里,可以显示如何准确,轻松地计算贝叶斯因子,以便通常可以通过计算贝叶斯因子来指导模型的最佳选择,从而常规地进行任何最小二乘或最大样子拟合,从而获得最佳参数估计。越来越多地使用了贝叶斯因子(例如贝叶斯信息标准(BIC))的近似值。 Occam的剃须刀表达了主要的直觉,该参数不应不必要地乘以,并且由BIC量化。贝叶斯因子量化了另外两个直觉。具有物理性参数的模型比具有物理无关参数的模型更可取。可能不适合数据但确实适合的模型比跨越数据空间的模型可取,因此可以保证适合数据。使用贝叶斯因素的结果通常与传统统计测试和BIC有很大不同。给出了三个例子。在这些示例的两个中,贝叶斯因子的简单计算是准确的。第三个示例说明了它有一些错误的罕见条件,并显示了如何诊断和纠正错误。
The Bayes factor is the gold-standard figure of merit for comparing fits of models to data, for hypothesis selection and parameter estimation. However it is little used because it is computationally very intensive. Here it is shown how Bayes factors can be calculated accurately and easily, so that any least-squares or maximum-likelihood fits may be routinely followed by the calculation of Bayes factors to guide the best choice of model and hence the best estimations of parameters. Approximations to the Bayes factor, such as the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), are increasingly used. Occam's razor expresses a primary intuition, that parameters should not be multiplied unnecessarily, and that is quantified by the BIC. The Bayes factor quantifies two further intuitions. Models with physically-meaningful parameters are preferable to models with physically-meaningless parameters. Models that could fail to fit the data, yet which do fit, are preferable to models which span the data space and are therefore guaranteed to fit the data. The outcomes of using Bayes factors are often very different from traditional statistics tests and from the BIC. Three examples are given. In two of these examples, the easy calculation of the Bayes factor is exact. The third example illustrates the rare conditions under which it has some error and shows how to diagnose and correct the error.