论文标题

Wikipedia在涵盖两极分子主题的文章中的超链接有多包容?

How Inclusive Are Wikipedia's Hyperlinks in Articles Covering Polarizing Topics?

论文作者

Menghini, Cristina, Anagnostopoulos, Aris, Upfal, Eli

论文摘要

Wikipedia依靠广泛的审查过程来验证每个单独页面的内容是否没有偏见,并提出了中性的观点。对Wikipedia的超链接结构的可能偏差,人们的关注减少了,这对访问多个页面时对用户的勘探过程产生了重大影响。超链接偏置的评估是具有挑战性的,因为它取决于全球视图,而不是单个页面的文本。在本文中,我们关注描述偏光主题互补方面的文章之间的互连拓扑的影响。我们介绍了一种新颖的量度,以衡量各种信息的暴露量,以量化用户在整个冲浪会话中量化主题不同方面的暴露,而不仅仅是一键单击。我们将此措施应用于六个两极分化主题(例如,枪支控制和枪支右),我们确定网络拓扑显着限制了用户接触该主题的各种信息的情况,从而鼓励用户保持知识泡沫。我们的发现表明,除了对单个文章的广泛审查之外,评估Wikipedia网络结构的重要性。

Wikipedia relies on an extensive review process to verify that the content of each individual page is unbiased and presents a neutral point of view. Less attention has been paid to possible biases in the hyperlink structure of Wikipedia, which has a significant influence on the user's exploration process when visiting more than one page. The evaluation of hyperlink bias is challenging because it depends on the global view rather than the text of individual pages. In this paper, we focus on the influence of the interconnect topology between articles describing complementary aspects of polarizing topics. We introduce a novel measure of exposure to diverse information to quantify users' exposure to different aspects of a topic throughout an entire surfing session, rather than just one click ahead. We apply this measure to six polarizing topics (e.g., gun control and gun right), and we identify cases in which the network topology significantly limits the exposure of users to diverse information on the topic, encouraging users to remain in a knowledge bubble. Our findings demonstrate the importance of evaluating Wikipedia's network structure in addition to the extensive review of individual articles.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源