论文标题

印度在科学研究中的等级和全球份额 - 来自不同数据库的数据如何产生不同的结果

India's rank and global share in scientific research -- how data sourced from different databases can produce varying outcomes

论文作者

Singh, Prashasti, Singh, Vivek Kumar, Arora, Parveen, Bhattacharya, Sujit

论文摘要

就全球研究产出和整体研究生产率等级而言,印度正成为世界上主要的知识生产国。印度政府以及独立国际机构的委托研究的许多最近报告都表明,印度在全球研究生产力的不同等级(与第三名到第9位一样大的变化)。本文研究了这一矛盾。试图分析为什么不同的报告将印度处于不同等级以及可能的原因。从三个主要的学术数据库中分析了印度的研究输出数据,以及世界上十个最有效的国家:为此目的,科学,Scopus和维度网络。结果表明,内源性因素(例如数据库覆盖率变化和不同的主题分类方案)和外源性因素(例如主题选择和出版计数方法)都会导致不同报告中的变化。本文报告了分析的第一部分,主要集中在使用不同数据库的数据引起的变化上。还讨论了该研究的政策影响。

India is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports places India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in different reports. This paper reports first part of the analysis, focusing mainly on variations due to use of data from different databases. The policy implications of the study are also discussed.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源