论文标题

验证和管理关于形式主义和假定量子力学的概念调查

Validation and Administration of a Conceptual Survey on the Formalism and Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

论文作者

Marshman, Emily, Singh, Chandralekha

论文摘要

我们开发了一项概念调查,重点介绍了高级本科量子力学课程所涵盖的量子力学的形式主义和假设。量子力学形式主义和假定调查中包括的概念(QMFP)着重于迪拉克符号,希尔伯特空间,状态媒介,物理可观察到的及其相应的Hermitian操作员,兼容和不兼容的可观察结果,量子测量,量子态的时间依赖性,量子态和期望值和旋转词汇力量以及旋转词汇力量。在这里,我们描述了调查的验证和管理,该调查已针对来自六个机构的400多名高级本科生和研究生进行了管理。 QMFP是有效且可靠的,可作为低赌注测试,以衡量涵盖相关内容的本科量子力学课程中的指导有效性。这项调查还可以被讲师使用,以确定学生对研究生量子力学课程的开始和结束时对量子力学的形式主义和假设的理解,因为预计研究生将参加涵盖调查中包含的内容的本科量子力学课程。我们发现,从事研究验证学习工具的本科生的表现要比在初中/高级量子量子力学课程的第一学期之后未参加QMFP的学生更好。此外,在核心研究生级量子力学课程的第一学期,研究生在QMFP上的表现要比本科量子力学课程的第一学期结束时的表现要好得多。与此处介绍的已验证QMFP的基线数据的比较可以帮助讲师评估其教学方法的有效性。

We developed and validated a conceptual survey that focuses on the formalism and postulates of quantum mechanics covered in upper-level undergraduate quantum mechanics courses. The concepts included in the Quantum Mechanics Formalism and Postulate Survey (QMFPS) focus on Dirac notation, the Hilbert space, state vectors, physical observables and their corresponding Hermitian operators, compatible and incompatible observables, quantum measurement, time-dependence of quantum states and expectation values, and spin angular momenta. Here we describe the validation and administration of the survey, which has been administered to over 400 upper-level undergraduate and graduate students from six institutions. The QMFPS is valid and reliable for use as a low-stakes test to measure the effectiveness of instruction in an undergraduate quantum mechanics course that covers relevant content. The survey can also be used by instructors to identify student understanding of the formalism and postulates of quantum mechanics at the beginning and end of a graduate quantum mechanics course since graduate students are expected to have taken an undergraduate quantum mechanics course that covers the content included in the survey. We found that undergraduate students who engaged with research-validated learning tools performed better than students who did not on the QMFPS after the first semester of a junior/senior level quantum mechanics course. In addition, the performance of graduate students on QMFPS after instruction in the first semester of a core graduate-level quantum mechanics course was significantly better than the performance of undergraduate students at the end of the first semester of an undergraduate quantum mechanics course. A comparison with the base line data on the validated QMFPS presented here can aid instructors in assessing the effectiveness of their instructional approaches.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源