论文标题
单一处理系统的等级3网络表示
A rank-3 network representation for single-affiliation systems
论文作者
论文摘要
在大自然和社会中观察到单一关联系统。例子包括协作,组织隶属关系和贸易库。这种系统的研究通常通过网络分析进行。多层网络扩展了网络分析的表示,以通过增加维度来包含更多信息。因此,他们能够更准确地表示他们正在建模的系统。但是,多层网络通常由等级4邻接张量表示,从而导致N2M2解决方案空间。单一关联系统无法占据该空间的全部范围,从而导致稀疏数据很难通过随后的分析获得统计置信度。为了克服这些局限性,本文提出了单一关联系统的等级3张量表示。这些表示能够在无方向网络中维护单一关联网络的完整信息,在有向网络中维持几乎完整的信息,减少其驻留在(N2M)中的解决方案空间,从而导致统计学意义,并保持多层方法的分析能力。这是通过在两个数据集上执行的等级3和等级4表示的比较来显示的:Bath of Bath Elexentmental Journal Journal 2000-2017和一个具有随机单一相关的ERDOS-RENYI网络。结果表明,网络的结构通过两种表示,而等级3表示对基于节点的度量的统计置信度提供了更大的统计置信度,并且可以很容易地显示出跨和内部的附属动力学。
Single-affiliation systems are observed across nature and society. Examples include collaboration, organisational affiliations, and trade-blocs. The study of such systems is commonly approached through network analysis. Multilayer networks extend the representation of network analysis to include more information through increased dimensionality. Thus, they are able to more accurately represent the systems they are modelling. However, multilayer networks are often represented by rank-4 adjacency tensors, resulting in a N2M2 solution space. Single-affiliation systems are unable to occupy the full extent of this space leading to sparse data where it is difficult to attain statistical confidence through subsequent analysis. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents a rank-3 tensor representation for single-affiliation systems. The representations is able to maintain full information of single-affiliation networks in directionless networks, maintain near full information in directed networks, reduce the solution space it resides in (N2M) leading to statistically significant findings, and maintain the analytical capability of multilayer approaches. This is shown through a comparison of the rank-3 and rank-4 representations which is performed on two datasets: the University of Bath departmental journal co-authorship 2000-2017 and an Erdos-Renyi network with random single-affiliation. The results demonstrate that the structure of the network is maintained through both representations, while the rank-3 representation provides greater statistical confidence in node-based measures, and can readily show inter- and intra-affiliation dynamics.