论文标题
广义Su-Schrieffer-Heeger型号的拓扑和非亲笔特征
Topological and non-topological features of generalized Su-Schrieffer-Heeger models
论文作者
论文摘要
(一维的)Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Hamiltonian被自旋轨道耦合和更长的跳跃增强,在一半填充偶数地点的情况下进行了研究。地面相图敏感地取决于模型的对称性。如果仅在两个偶数和奇数位点之间允许跳跃,则保守电荷结合(粒子孔)对称性。在这种情况下(BDI对称性),我们发现各种拓扑非平凡的阶段,其特征是不同数量的边缘状态(或等效地,不同的量化Zak阶段)。这些阶段之间的过渡通过纠缠熵明确表示。如果接纳在sublattices中的跳跃(将系统驱动到AI对称类别),则断电对称性会破坏。我们分别针对$ a $和$ b $ sublattices的幅度$ t_a $和$ t_b $进行了专门研究的下一个新的邻居跳跃。对于$ t_a = t_b $奇偶校验得以保存,并且量化的Zak阶段在相图的间隙区域中保持不变。但是,由于参数空间的某些区域中的传导和价带之间的重叠,金属斑块出现。 $ t_a = -t_b $交替交替的邻居跳跃的情况也很了不起,因为它破坏了电荷连接$ c $ and Parity $ p $,但可以保存产品$ CP $。 Zak阶段和纠缠频谱仍然提供相关信息,特别是关于奇偶校验破裂的信息。因此,$ t_a $的小值的Zak阶段衡量了$ a $ a $ a和$ b $ sublattices上的债券强度之间的差异,与Zak阶段与相关的Aubry-André模型的偏振相似。
The (one-dimensional) Su-Schrieffer-Heeger Hamiltonian, augmented by spin-orbit coupling and longer-range hopping, is studied at half filling for an even number of sites. The ground-state phase diagram depends sensitively on the symmetry of the model. Charge-conjugation (particle-hole) symmetry is conserved if hopping is only allowed between the two sublattices of even and odd sites. In this case (of BDI symmetry) we find a variety of topologically non-trivial phases, characterized by different numbers of edge states (or, equivalently, different quantized Zak phases). The transitions between these phases are clearly signalled by the entanglement entropy. Charge-conjugation symmetry is broken if hopping within the sublattices is admitted (driving the system into the AI symmetry class). We study specifically next-nearest-neighbor hopping with amplitudes $t_a$ and $t_b$ for the $A$ and $B$ sublattices, respectively. For $t_a=t_b$ parity is conserved, and also the quantized Zak phases remain unchanged in the gapped regions of the phase diagram. However, metallic patches appear due to the overlap between conduction and valence bands in some regions of parameter space. The case of alternating next-nearest neighbor hopping, $t_a=-t_b$, is also remarkable, as it breaks both charge-conjugation $C$ and parity $P$ but conserves the product $CP$. Both the Zak phase and the entanglement spectrum still provide relevant information, in particular about the broken parity. Thus the Zak phase for small values of $t_a$ measures the disparity between bond strengths on $A$ and $B$ sublattices, in close analogy to the proportionality between the Zak phase and the polarization in the case of the related Aubry-André model.