论文标题
$ \ ell^1 $ - 合成的抽样率
Sampling Rates for $\ell^1$-Synthesis
论文作者
论文摘要
这项工作调查了基于合成的稀疏模型的假设,从不足的嘈杂噪声下采样的噪声下噪声测量问题。求解$ \ ell^1 $ - 同步基础追踪允许同时估计系数表示以及所寻求的信号。但是,由于冗余词典原子中的线性依赖性,尽管实际信号仍然成功恢复,但可能无法识别特定的表示向量。目前的手稿从不均匀,信号依赖性的角度研究了两个估计问题。通过利用线性反问题的凸几何形状的最新结果,可以确定描述每个公式相变的采样率。在这两种情况下,它们均由$ \ ell^1 $ deScent锥的圆锥高斯平均宽度给出,该锥体是由字典线性转换的。通常,这种表达不允许通过遵循文献中常见的基于极性的方法来进行简单的计算。因此,提供了两个涉及系数表示稀疏性的上限:第一个基于局部条件编号,第二个基于几何分析的第二个界限,该数字分析的第二个是基于使用太多发电机的高维多面体锥的薄度。此外,还表明,对于鲁棒性而言,这两个恢复问题都可能截然不同,这在大多数相关文献中似乎都没有注意到这一事实。所有见解都被数值模拟仔细破坏。
This work investigates the problem of signal recovery from undersampled noisy sub-Gaussian measurements under the assumption of a synthesis-based sparsity model. Solving the $\ell^1$-synthesis basis pursuit allows for a simultaneous estimation of a coefficient representation as well as the sought-for signal. However, due to linear dependencies within redundant dictionary atoms it might be impossible to identify a specific representation vector, although the actual signal is still successfully recovered. The present manuscript studies both estimation problems from a non-uniform, signal-dependent perspective. By utilizing recent results on the convex geometry of linear inverse problems, the sampling rates describing the phase transitions of each formulation are identified. In both cases, they are given by the conic Gaussian mean width of an $\ell^1$-descent cone that is linearly transformed by the dictionary. In general, this expression does not allow a simple calculation by following the polarity-based approach commonly found in the literature. Hence, two upper bounds involving the sparsity of coefficient representations are provided: The first one is based on a local condition number and the second one on a geometric analysis that makes use of the thinness of high-dimensional polyhedral cones with not too many generators. It is furthermore revealed that both recovery problems can differ dramatically with respect to robustness to measurement noise -- a fact that seems to have gone unnoticed in most of the related literature. All insights are carefully undermined by numerical simulations.