论文标题

LIDAR和卫星观测值的重力波电势密度的季节性周期为$ 54^{\ Circ} $ n和$ 69^{\ Circ} $ n

Seasonal Cycle of Gravity Wave Potential Energy Density from Lidar and Satellite Observations at $54^{\circ}$N and $69^{\circ}$N

论文作者

Almowafy, Marwa, Baumgarten, Gerd, Baumgarten, Kathrin, Ern, Manfred, Gerding, Michael, Lübken, Franz-Josef, Strelnikova, Irina

论文摘要

我们介绍了高北纬度(Andenes/Norway,$ 69^{\ Circ} $ n,$ 16^{\ Circ} $ E)的重力波势能密度的第一个季节性周期(Andenes/Norway,$ 69^{\ Circ} $),并与在中间纬度上进行的类似观察(Kühlungsborn/cipcrip,$ 54^^}, $ 12^{\ circ} $ e)。势能密度源自在这些位点观察到的垂直和时间分辨率高的LIDAR温度曲线。这两个激光雷达都具有白天和黑夜测量的独特能力,覆盖高度从30到80公里。在2012 - 2016年期间,总共$ \ sim $ 3000和$ \ sim $ 6000小时的观察值分别在安德纳斯和库伦斯伯恩提供。该数据集用于确定平均重力波势能密度的季节性变化,$ e_ {pot} $。我们已经分别应用了波长和频率滤波,以说明大规模波(例如潮汐)的潜在影响。尽管这两个位置在纬度,地形和平均背景条件方面均大不相同,但两个站点的$ e_ {pot} $值相当相似,即,每月均值偏离2倍小于2倍。平均势能密度显示在两个位置在夏季(冬季)最小(最大)值的明显季节性变化。但是,冬季/夏季的差异仅为$ \ sim $ 3。我们已经将这些激光雷达结果与Saber的观察结果(使用宽带发射辐射测定法对大气的启发)进行了比较,并考虑了观察性设置的差异,并找到了令人满意的协议。

We present the first seasonal cycle of gravity wave potential energy densities from ground-based lidar at high northern latitudes (Andenes/Norway, $69^{\circ}$N, $16^{\circ}$E) and compare with similar observations performed at middle latitudes (Kühlungsborn/Germany, $54^{\circ}$N, $12^{\circ}$E). Potential energy densities are derived from lidar temperature profiles observed with high vertical and temporal resolution at these sites. Both lidars have the unique capability of measuring during day and night, covering an altitude range from 30 to about 80 km. For the years 2012-2016 a total of $\sim$ 3000 and $\sim$ 6000 hours of observations were available at Andenes and Kühlungsborn, respectively. This data set was used to determine the seasonal variation of mean gravity wave potential energy densities, $E_{pot}$. We have applied wavelength and frequency filtering separately to account for potential influence of large scale waves such as tides. Despite the fact that both locations are rather different in terms of latitude, topography, and mean background conditions, the $E_{pot}$ values at both stations are rather similar, i.e. the monthly means deviate by less than a factor of 2. The mean potential energy densities show a clear seasonal variation at both locations with minimum (maximum) values in summer (winter). However, the winter/summer difference is only a factor of $\sim$ 3. We have compared these lidar results with observations from the SABER (Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry) satellite instrument and find satisfying agreement considering the differences in observational setup.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源