论文标题

在两个不同的位置未观察到公元前3372 - 3371年的快速14C游览,对Wang等人的评论。 (2017)

Rapid 14C excursion at 3372-3371 BCE not observed at two different locations, a comment on Wang et al. (2017)

论文作者

Jull, AJ Timothy, Panyushkina, Irina, Salzer, Matthew, Baisan, Chris, Molnar, Mihaly, Varga, Tamas, Wacker, Lukas, Brehm, Nicholas, Tegel, Willy

论文摘要

在树环中测得的碳14记录中的偏移归因于各种高能量但短暂的宇宙效应。到目前为止,公元774 - 775年,公元993 - 994年和公元前660年的快速变化被令人信服地解释为由于太阳能宇宙 - 射线通量的快速变化,通常经过认可,通常通过在不同位置和不同实验室的树木事件中繁殖,随后是其他质基因冰层中其他质基因层的峰值。在2017年,Wang等人。根据公元前3372 - 3371年的新事件,基于一组每年的14C数据,该数据是根据从中国翅片树(翼翅目)埋入的一系列树环中测量的一系列浮动树环。我们试图在来自美国加利福尼亚州怀特山脉的一个绝对过时的Bristlecone Pine标本(Pinus longaeva)的树环中复制这一事件。不幸的是,我们无法确定在此期间是否有14C巡回演出,尽管可以观察到常规的11年schwabe周期。因此,在公元前3372 - 3371年建议的宇宙射线事件的存在无法确认。暴露的14C尖峰可能发生在其他时间,除非适当地杂交,否则我们无法确定的绝对年龄无法确定。 (2017年)与我们的记录并不一致。无论哪种情况,这都很重要,因为这种极端宇宙事件的频率需要得到充分记录,以评估将来发生类似的高能效应的可能性。

Excursions in the carbon-14 record measured in tree rings are attributed to various high energy but short-lived cosmic effects. So far, rapid changes at 774-775 CE, 993-994 CE and 660 BCE have been convincingly interpreted as due to rapid changes in solar cosmic-ray flux, usually accredited with reproduction of the events in trees at different locations and different laboratories, and followed with equivalent peaks of other cosmogenic isotopes in polar ice cores. In 2017, Wang et al. proposed a new event at 3372-3371 BCE based on a single set of annual 14C data measured on a floating series of tree rings sampled from a buried specimen of Chinese wingnut tree (Pterocarya stenoptera). We attempted to reproduce this event in tree rings of an absolutely dated bristlecone pine specimen (Pinus longaeva) from the White Mountains, California USA and a subfossil European oak (Quercus sp.) from the Moselle River Valley in France. Unfortunately, we are unable to determine whether there is any rapid 14C excursion during this time, although the regular 11-year Schwabe cycle is clearly observable. Therefore, the presence of a cosmic-ray event as suggested at 3372-3371 BCE cannot be confirmed. It is possible the exposed 14C spike occurred at some other time, the absolute age of which we cannot determine unless the precise calendar age of the Chinese wingnut wood is properly crossdated, although the other data of Wang et al. (2017) is not inconsistent with our records. In either case, this is important because the frequency of such extreme cosmic events needs to be well-documented to assess the likelihood of similar high-energy effects occurring in the future.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源