论文标题

二维和三维可压缩对流的比较

Comparison of two- and three-dimensional compressible convection in a pre-main sequence star

论文作者

Pratt, J., Baraffe, I., Goffrey, T., Geroux, C., Constantino, T., Folini, D., Walder, R.

论文摘要

为了将三维流体动力学模拟与相同设置的二维模拟,我们将最近对二维恒星对流的研究扩展到了3D,以实现现实的前序列序列。我们比较了与对流流有关的统计量,包括:平均速度,涡度,局部腹膜和对流区域的穿透深度。这些统计数据是在恒星对流区的固定,稳态可压缩对流过程中产生的。我们使用音乐代码的模拟证实了共同的结果,即恒星对流的二维模拟平均速度比三维模拟更高。边界条件和球形壳的程度会影响对流速度的幅度和变化。 2D和3D速度之间的差异取决于这些背景点。在我们的模拟中,这可能具有与模拟维度差异所产生的差异一样大。然而,在我们的2D和3D模拟中,对流边界附近的径向速度是可比的。对于二维模拟,流量的平均局部肠道比三维模拟要低,这表明3D恒星对流的形状和结构不同。我们使用最近的研究中提出的模型对对流区域的对流穿透深度进行统计分析(Pratt等人,2017年)。在这里,我们分析了三维模拟中的对流渗透,并将结果与​​相同设置的2D模拟进行了比较。在3D中,穿透深度与由2D模拟计算得出的穿透深度一样大。

Extending our recent studies of two-dimensional stellar convection to 3D, we compare three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations to identically set-up two-dimensional simulations, for a realistic pre-main sequence star. We compare statistical quantities related to convective flows including: average velocity, vorticity, local enstrophy, and penetration depth beneath a convection zone. These statistics are produced during stationary, steady-state compressible convection in the star's convection zone. Our simulations with the MUSIC code confirm the common result that two-dimensional simulations of stellar convection have a higher magnitude of velocity on average than three-dimensional simulations. Boundary conditions and the extent of the spherical shell can affect the magnitude and variability of convective velocities. The difference between 2D and 3D velocities is dependent on these background points; in our simulations this can have an effect as large as the difference resulting from the dimensionality of the simulation. Nevertheless, radial velocities near the convective boundary are comparable in our 2D and 3D simulations. The average local enstrophy of the flow is lower for two-dimensional simulations than for three-dimensional simulations, indicating a different shape and structuring of 3D stellar convection. We perform a statistical analysis of the depth of convective penetration below the convection zone, using the model proposed in our recent study (Pratt et al. 2017). Here we analyze the convective penetration in three dimensional simulations, and compare the results to identically set-up 2D simulations. In 3D the penetration depth is as large as the penetration depth calculated from 2D simulations.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源