论文标题
LightGCN:简化和供电图形卷积网络用于推荐
LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendation
论文作者
论文摘要
图形卷积网络(GCN)已成为用于协作过滤的新最新。然而,其推荐有效性的原因尚未得到充分理解。适应GCN建议的现有工作缺乏对GCN的彻底消融分析,GCN最初是为图形分类任务而设计的,并配备了许多神经网络操作。但是,我们从经验上发现,GCN中最常见的两个设计(特征转换和非线性激活)对协作过滤的性能无济于事。更糟糕的是,包括它们在内增加了培训和降低建议性能的困难。 在这项工作中,我们旨在简化GCN的设计,以使其更简洁,适合推荐。我们提出了一个名为LightGCN的新模型,其中包括用于协作过滤的GCN中最重要的组件 - 社区聚合。具体而言,LightGCN通过线性地将用户和项目嵌入方式在用户项目交互图上进行线性学习,并使用所有图层中学到的嵌入的加权总和作为最终嵌入。这种简单,线性和整洁的模型更容易实施和训练,比神经图协作过滤(NGCF)(一种基于最新的GCN的最先进的建议模型)在同一实验环境下表现出了实质性改进(平均相对改进)(平均相对改进)。从分析和经验的角度,对简单的LightGCN的合理性提供了进一步的分析。
Graph Convolution Network (GCN) has become new state-of-the-art for collaborative filtering. Nevertheless, the reasons of its effectiveness for recommendation are not well understood. Existing work that adapts GCN to recommendation lacks thorough ablation analyses on GCN, which is originally designed for graph classification tasks and equipped with many neural network operations. However, we empirically find that the two most common designs in GCNs -- feature transformation and nonlinear activation -- contribute little to the performance of collaborative filtering. Even worse, including them adds to the difficulty of training and degrades recommendation performance. In this work, we aim to simplify the design of GCN to make it more concise and appropriate for recommendation. We propose a new model named LightGCN, including only the most essential component in GCN -- neighborhood aggregation -- for collaborative filtering. Specifically, LightGCN learns user and item embeddings by linearly propagating them on the user-item interaction graph, and uses the weighted sum of the embeddings learned at all layers as the final embedding. Such simple, linear, and neat model is much easier to implement and train, exhibiting substantial improvements (about 16.0\% relative improvement on average) over Neural Graph Collaborative Filtering (NGCF) -- a state-of-the-art GCN-based recommender model -- under exactly the same experimental setting. Further analyses are provided towards the rationality of the simple LightGCN from both analytical and empirical perspectives.